|
The Origins and History of
The American Bill of Rights
I. Defining Rights of Man in England
a. The Magna Carta, (Runnymede 1215); first time in English
history a written document laid down binding rules of law that even the
sovereign himself may not violate.
- A bargain between the King and the nation
- Specified the basic liberties of Englishmen of the day
- 2 key provisions;
- Chapter 12; "Scutage or aid shall be levied in our kingdom
only by the common counsel of our kingdom"
- Chapter 39; "No freeman shall be captured or imprisoned or
diseased or outlawed or exiled or in any way destroyed . . .
except by the lawful judgment of his peers and by the law of the
land."
- The mere existence of this document, extorted from the king,
remained a standing condemnation of government absolutism.
b. The Petition of Right, (1628); Declared fundamental
rights of Englishmen as positive law
- Sent from Parliament to Charles I
- That no man be asked to make loan, gift, benevolence, tax
without counsel of Parliament
- Did not provide machinery for enforcement or …
- Alter the balance between crown and parliament
- Constantly violated by King Charles I
c. Council of Officers of the Army to the House of Commons
(1649)
- "A Petition . . . concerning of an agreement of the people, by
them framed and prepared . . .."
- Not recognized at the time, listed fundamental rights
- Religion, military conscription, speech, sanctity of the public
debt, no punishment where there was no law before, equality before
the law
d. English Bill of Rights (1689); "that second Magna
Carta"
- Culmination of the Glorious Revolution of 1688
- Royal efforts to dominate Parliament must cease
- Free election of members of Parliament
- Freedom of speech and debate in Parliament ought not to be
questioned
- Parliament ought to be held frequently…
- Triennial Act (1694); Prohibited the intermission of
Parliament for more than 3 years
- Specifically condemned the abuses of power by James II
- Rudimentary statement of the right to keep and bear arms
- Complaint of quartering of soldiers in private homes
- Excessive bail, fines, cruel or unusual punishment inflicted
- Ancestor of our Eight Amendment
e. Traditional or unwritten law
- Rights of free speech, press, and petition
- Unreasonable searches and seizure
- Double jeopardy and excessive fines
|
** Please Note **
There was a difference
between the concept of constitutionalism in England and that drawn up by
the framers. Americans knew it was not enough to declare fundamental
rights and limitations in a document;
- Just as important was a machinery of enforcement
- Checks and balances and the power of the courts to control
constitutionality of government action
- Judicial review was made possible
|
II. The Colonies; Settled by Englishmen – When Englishmen
migrated, they took with them, all the first great privileges of Englishmen
on their backs. Richard West, Counsel to the Board of Trade 1720; "Let an
Englishman go where he will he carries as much of law and liberty with him,
as the nature of things will bear."
a. The Virginia Charter – outset of colonization
- Established the precedent that the American colonists were
entitled to all the rights of Englishmen
- Only first in a series
b. Massachusetts Body of Liberties (1641)
- First detailed charter of liberties and a model for future
colonial enactments
- To replace the oligarchy established by the company with a
representative system
- Liberties of women, children, servants, aliens and dumb
animals
- Outlawed slavery
- Rights of individual liberty rested upon the courts
- Protection against taking property without compensation
- Freedom of speech
- Right of counsel, trial by jury, double jeopardy
- First American attempt to give effect that people’s basic rights
should be written in a document
c. Origins of Freedom of Religion
- Colonies in large settled in response to religious intolerance
back home
- Those who came over, got in power, often practiced the same
religious intolerance, i.e. the Puritans in Massachusetts
- Maryland Act Concerning Religion 1649 (Toleration Act)
- First colony to recognize a measure of freedom of conscience
- 1654, Puritans retained control, act was repealed
- 1692, Maryland became a royal province
- Church of England est. 1702
III. The Colonial Pattern of declaring personal rights
Colonial charters and enactments were far more explicit than
comparable documents in English history
When it was time to write the Federal Bill of Rights, those rights
were already guaranteed in the charters and enactments of colonies
- Rhode Island Charter
- Freedom of Religion
Massachusetts Body of Liberties
- Freedom of Speech & Petition
- Right not to have property taken without just compensation
- Double jeopardy
- Right to witness and counsel
- Right to bail
- Protection against cruel and unusual punishment
New York Charter of Liberties
- Right against quartering soldiers
- Trial by jury
Magna Carta and in most colonial fundamental documents
West Jersey Concessions
Pennsylvania Charter of Privileges
- Right to witness and counsel
Most of these were drawn up before the English Bill of Rights
a. The Declaration and Resolves, adopted October 14,
1774
- Starts by asserting the right to life, liberty and property
- Claims to all the rights, liberties and immunities of Englishmen
- The right to trial by jury of "vicinage" (Sixth Amendment)
- Right not to have soldiers quartered
- Right to peaceably assemble, consider grievances, and petition
the king
- Direct precursor to the declaration of rights contained in the
revolutionary state constitutions
- The right to personal liberty vindicated by the Great Writ of
Habeas Corpus
- Freedom of the Press
b. Virginia Declaration of Rights
- First true Bill of Rights in the modern American sense
- Written by George Mason, planter, no formal legal training
- 16 Articles, 9 state general principles of a free republic
- Article 5; separation of powers as a rule of positive law
- Article 8; right to a speedy trial by a grand jury of peers
- To be informed of the charges of the accusation
- Confronted with the accuser and witnesses
- Not to have to testify against oneself
- Did omit freedom of speech, assembly, right to counsel,
protection against double jeopardy
c. Pennsylvania Declaration – Article XII
- First time guarantees of freedom of speech as well as freedom of
religion
- Major step in development of an American Bill of Rights
d. Judicial Review;
- There was no umpire or judge under the British Constitution to
determine when government exceeds its authority
- Courts were not given that power
- The idea that a judge could strike down a law created by the
people did not occur to the framers during the creation of the
Constitution or the Bill of Rights – but developed over time in
response to events
IV. Establishing a Bill of Rights After Independence
a. Opposing Opinions – Federalists and anti-Federalists
|
Federalists |
Anti-Federalists |
- Supporters of the Constitution
- The term was once used by opponents of centralization – implying
that they were less committed to a nationalist government than they
really were
- Ben Franklin
- George Washington
- These three wrote under the pseudonyms Publius the
Federalists Papers
- Alexander Hamilton
- James Madison
- John Jay
|
- The term suggests they have nothing to offer except opposition
- Saw themselves as true defenders of the principles of the
Revolution
- A strong, possible dictatorial center of power would betray the
principles of the revolution
- Patrick Henry
- Samuel Adams
- Felt the new government would
- Increase taxes
- Weaken the states
- Wield dictatorial powers
- Constitution lacked Bill of Rights
- No government could be trusted to protect the liberties of its
citizens
|
b. Ratification of the Constitution proceeded – 1787 –
1788
- Delaware, New Jersey, Georgia ratified the Constitution
unanimously
- New Hampshire ratified in June 1788 – the 9th state
- NY and Va had divided conventions
- Ratified with the assumption that a Bill of Rights would be
added
- North Carolina’s convention adjourned – to wait to see what
happened to the Amendments
- Rhode Island did not even consider ratification
c. Seeing the Need
- First Congress – essentially a continuation of the
Constitutional Convention
- Principle responsibility; filling in the gaps in the
Constitution
- Drafting a Bill of Rights
- James Madison came to see the need for a Bill of Rights
- It would legitimize the new government in the eyes of its
opponents
The American Bill of Rights
V. The Un-ratified Duo
- The First Amendment – not ratified
". . . there shall be one Representative for every thirty
thousand, until the number shall amount to one hundred, after which,
the proportion shall be so regulated by Congress, that there shall
be not less than one hundred Representative, nor less than one
Representative for every forty thousand persons, until the number of
Representatives shall amount to two hundred, after which the
proportion shall be so regulated by Congress, that there shall not
be less than two hundred Representatives, nor more than one
Representative for every fifty thousand persons."
- The importance
- Structural in form as a modification of Article I, Section 2
- Our 10th, their 12th are both structural
- Keeps us from viewing the 12th (really the 10th)
as an add-on
- Responded to the single most important concern of the
anti-Federalists
- Classical political theory suggested that republics could
thrive only in geographically and demographically small societies
– citizens would be shaped by common climate and culture, hold
homogeneous world views, know each other and could meet face to
face to deliberate on public issues
- Federalists felt a large and heterogeneous society could
actually produce a more stable society
- Why if failed…
- Intricate mathematical formula made little sense
- What it promised in the short-term, increased congressional
size, it took back in the long run because it established a
maximum, not a minimum.
- The Second Amendment – not ratified
- Would become the Twenty-seventh Amendment
"No law, varying the compensation for the services of Senators
and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of
Representatives shall have intervened."
- Dealt with government structure rather than individual rights
- Both Amendments were attempts to strengthen majoritarianism
rather than to check it
- Both sought to tighten the link between representatives and
their constituents
- 1st by democratizing representation
- 2nd by stressing elections
|
** Please Note **
Congress 1816
Enacted the first congressional pay raise since 1789 and refused to
defer the increase until after the next election. An angry electorate
responded by voting incumbents out of office in record numbers |
VI. The 10 Amendments that make up The Bill of Rights
Our First Amendment: Freedom of Expression
- The first not because of importance, but by accident because the
original first and second failed ratification
a. Religion
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof . . .."
- Prohibited the national legislature from interfering with, or
trying to disestablish, churches established by state and local
governments
- Church and state were hardly separate
- 1789; at least six states had government sponsored churches
- At least four, in their constitutions, barred non-Christians
from holding public office
- Eleven of thirteen had religious qualifications for office
holding
- ACLU;
b. Speech & Press
"Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press . . .."
- Sounds in structure and focuses (at least in part) on the
representational link between Congress and its constituents
- Reaffirms structural role of free speech and free press in a
working democracy
- The body being restrained is not a hostile majority, but
rather Congress
- From the ACLU Briefing Paper #9; The Bill of Rights: A Brief
History "This country’s original citizens believed that as human
beings, they were entitled to free speech, and they invented
(emphasis mine) the First Amendment in order to protect it."
- ACLU; "Even unpopular expression is protected from government
suppression or censorship."
- Sedition Acts: 1798, outlawed criticism of the government,
expired in 1801
- Espionage Act of 1917; prohibited any interference with the
draft, as well as "any disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive
language about the form of government of the United States."
- Schenck v. United States
; held that the espionage act did
not violate the First Amendment
2. The Second Amendment: The Right to Keep and
Bear Arms
"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a
free people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
- Question; Does the Second Amendment protect only the rights of the
states to have militias, or does it give individuals a right to bear
arms for self-defense as well as national defense?
a. Only part of the Bill of Rights with an introductory clause
- How is this clause interpreted…
- This clause gives the people the right to bear arms only as part
of a "well regulated militia"
|
- Emphasizes that a militia, at the time of the adoption of the Bill
of Rights, consisted of the "body of the people" as affirmed in
several of the state resolutions proposing that a bill of rights be
added.
|
| "An
18th century right to bear arms is as out of place as silk
knee britches and tricornered hats." Daniel Lazare |
"The framers recognized that self-government requires the people’s
access to bullets as well as ballots." Akhil Reed
Amar |
- "the people" appears in the First, Fourth, and Ninth Amendments
- Applying to individuals, not states
- The Supreme Court has held that the Second Amendment does not
apply to the states, so it does not bar gun control measures by
local or state governments
- No right, however, is absolute
- Federalist 46; James Madison, "the advantage of being armed,
which the Americans posses over the people of almost every other
nation."
|
Excerpt from "When I Was a Kid, This Was a Free Country"
There exists in this country an elite that believes itself entitled to
tell the rest of us what we may and may not do – for our own good of
course. These left-of-center, Ivy-educated molders of public opinion are
concentrated in the mass news media, the entertainment business,
academia, the pundit corps, and the legislative, judicial, and
administrative government bureaucracies. Call it the divine right of
policy wonks. These people feed on the great American middle class, who
do the actual work of this country and make it all happen. They bleed us
with an income tax rate not seen since we were fighting for our lives in
the middle of World War II; they charge us top dollar at the box office
for movies that assail and undermine the values we are attempting to
inculcate in our children; they charge more and more for a constantly
degraded higher education for which most of us arrive unprepared because
of an even more degraded elementary and secondary school education . . .
for which they want more and more money
I believe it has occurred to the self-anointed "betters" that, at
some point, we the people are likely to say "Enough!" and at that point,
the thought of 100 million Americans armed with 230 million firearms is
positively terrifying.
G. Gordon Liddy |
- Complaints of gun safety unfounded
- Centers for Disease Control defines children as anyone under the
age of nineteen for deaths of children with firearms
- Most gun related deaths for 14 – 19 year olds results from
inner-city violence due to drugs and gang activity
- The remaining number is 121 deaths in 1998 (1,003 died in
accidental drowning in unattended swimming pools, 661 from
accidental suffocation, and 608 from accidental burns)
3. The Third Amendment : Quartering of Troops
"No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house,
without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of ear, but in a manner
to be prescribed by law."
- More states included this provision in proposing amendments to the
Constitution than freedom of speech
- Colonists opposed the Quartering Act as a tax forcing them to pay
for a permanent or standing army they did not want
- The Supreme Court has never specifically ruled on its meaning but
has cited it as support for a constitutional right of privacy
4. The Fourth Amendment : Unreasonable Searches
and Seizures
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses,
papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall
not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probably cause,
supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the
place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
- Common English practice – general warrants, allowed crown agents to
search anywhere they wanted and seize anything they pleased
- Writ of Assistance; British customs officials used this general
warrant to search colonial homes and businesses for smuggled goods
- After the Revolutionary War, eight states prohibited general
warrants in their new constitutions
5. The Fifth Amendment : Due Process of Law
"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise
infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury,
except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the
Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor
shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in
jeopardy of life or limb, nor shall be compelled in any criminal case
to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or
property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be
taken for public use, without just compensation."
- Guarantees Five rights of a diverse nature
- The right against self-incrimination in criminal cases
- The right to have serious criminal charges screened by a grand
jury
- The right to avoid being tried twice for the same offense
- The right to due process of law
- The right to receive just compensation when private property is
taken for public use
- Grand jury originated in England in the twelfth century to limit the
government’s power to charge defendants with a crime, unless justified
by the evidence
- Grand jury took on added importance as a protection against the
crown’s arbitrary use of power
- In England, the right against self-incrimination grew out of the
abuse of a system of inquisition – or questioning accused persons under
oath to determine their guilt
6. The Sixth Amendment : The Right to a Fair Trial
"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to
a speedy trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein
the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been
previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and
cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witness against
him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor,
and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense."
- Colonial Americans faced the disadvantages faced by those accused of
crimes under English law
- Massachusetts Body of Liberties in 1641, first to protect the right
to a speedy trial, by a jury, and with counsel
- Repeats Article III’s guarantee of a trial by jury in criminal
cases, but adds…
- The right to subpoena witnesses and have a lawyer
- Attempts to balance the enormous power of state (which pays for both
police and prosecutors to prove guilt) against the power of the
individual to prove innocence
- Declaration of Independence cited these jury issues
- Colonists were outraged when Parliament allowed colonists to be
tried in courts without juries for violations of the Stamp Act of 1765
- Colonists could be transported back to England for trial
| "In
this country, if someone dislikes you, or accuses you, he must come up
in front . . . The phrase still persists, ‘Look me in the eye and say
that’." Justice Antonin Scalia |
7. The Seventh Amendment : Trial by Jury in Civil
Cases
"In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall
exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved,
and no fact tried by jury shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court
of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law."
- Third time in the Constitution trial by jury is guaranteed
- Also limits a judge’s power to overturn factual decision by a jury,
which could otherwise render a jury’s power meaningless
- The English used trial by jury to resolve disputes
- Some legal scholars have proposed that like the English, America
abolish jury trial in civil cases – juries may not be the best
dispensers of justice because of the complex of the facts involved
- Others believe jury trial is essential to democratic self-government
8. The Eighth Amendment : Cruel and Unusual
Punishment
"Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed,
nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted."
- Comes almost word for word from the English Bill of Rights of 1689
- Massachusetts Body of Liberties in 1689 also provided for bail and
forbade cruel and unusual punishment
9. The Ninth Amendment : Unenumerated Rights
"The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not
be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."
- With such a list of rights, one might assume that this was all there
was
- James Madison included unenumerated rights – rights retained by the
people but not written down in the Constitution
- Advocates of judicial restraint argue that such interpretations of
the Ninth Amendment gives judges too much discretion
- Among the unenumerated rights are the right to travel, the right to
vote, the right to privacy, the right to have an abortion, to have
children, to marry, sexual privacy outside of marriage
- Could the vague language of this Amendment give unelected judges an
unlimited license to create constitutional rights and overturn the
decision of democratic majorities
10. The Tenth Amendment : States Rights
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution,
nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States
respectively, or to the people."
- Protects powers, not rights – of the states, not individuals
- This is the only of the Bill of Rights that was recommended by all
the state conventions that submitted proposed amendments
- Seeds of the Civil War – Does the conflict over slavery go back to
this amendment and the right of the states to decide for themselves?
- The slave states had slaves and secession didn’t begin until
Lincoln was elected president – no attempt to stop slavery had begun
at that point, merely the election of a Republican president
Bibliography
Amar, Akhil Reed. The Bill of Rights. New Haven: Yale University
Press, 1998
Liddy, G. Gordon. When I Was a Kid, This Was a Free Country.
Washington DC: Regenery Publishing, Inc., 2002
Monk, Linda R. The Words We Live By: Your Annotated Guide to the
Constitution, New York: Hyperion, 2003
Patrick, John J. The Bill of Rights: A History in Documents, New
York: Oxford University Press , 2003
Schwartz, Bernard. The Great Rights of Mankind: A History of the
American Bill of Rights, New York: Oxford University Press, 1977
"The Bill of Rights: A Brief History" <http://archive.aclu.org/library/pbp9.html>.
[accessed 3 March 2004].
National Archives & Records Administration - <http://www.archives.gov>
|